Britain’s biggest wild animal ‘killed for antlers’

LONDON (AFP) – A giant red stag thought to be Britain’s biggest wild animal was killed for its antlers, according to reports on Tuesday.

The body of the “Exmoor Emperor,” named after the southwestern area where the stag was frequently sighted, was found close to a road in the county of Devon.

It is believed that a licensed hunter is responsible for legally killing the stag, which stood nine feet (2.75 metres) to the tips of its antlers.

An industry source claimed hunters would have paid up to 10,000 pounds (15,800 dollars, 11,300 euros) to the landowner for the opportunity to shoot the creature.

But the action still drew condemnation from deer-lovers who believe hunting should be banned during the mating season.

“It could be that he didn’t get a chance to rut properly this year, therefore his genes have not been passed on this time round,” Peter Donnelly, an Exmoor-based deer management expert, said.

“The poor things should be left alone during the rut, not harried from pillar to post.”

The identity of the marksman remains a mystery, but it is believed to be one of the increasing number of wealthy sportsmen who are flooding to the area in search of a trophy.

“There are people who are prepared to spend quite ridiculous sums of money to have a trophy on their wall,” Donnelly added.

“People talk about 1,000 pounds for a good head, but I’ve heard there are those who will pay a lot more.”

One source from the hunting industry told AFP: “I think they would have paid around 10,000 pounds for the privilege.”

Although not illegal, hunting during the mating season is frowned upon as the mating stags are often underfed and tired due to their exertions, presenting an easy target.

Older stags are regularly culled due to the historic eradication of any natural predators but at around 12 years old, the Emperor is thought to have had more productive mating seasons left in him.

Original article here

Archaeologists Unearth Neanderthal Tools In Britain

Wednesday, 2 June 2010, 13:15 CDT

Archaeologists reported on Tuesday that they have found the earliest evidence of Neanderthals living in Britain. Two pieces of flint dating back 110,000 years ago were found at a construction site in Dartford, Kent. Dr. Francis Wendan-Smith, from Southampton University, said the finds push back the presence of Neanderthals in Britain by 40,000 years or more. A majority of researchers believe Britain was uninhabited by humans during the time the flint tools date back too.

An absence of archaeological evidence suggests people abandoned this land between 200,000 years ago and 65,000 years ago. However, one researcher said the evidence presented so far did not convince him. Dr. Mark White from Durham University told BBC News he would like to assess the findings in detail before considering whether they posed a challenge to the majority view that humans were absent from Britain at this time.

The excavation that uncovered the flint hand tool and waste flake was funded by the U.K.’s Highways Agency. Wenban-Smith and colleagues from Oxford Archaeology have dated the sediments back 110,00 years, placing them within the “abandonment period.” The discovery comes from a time when sea levels were dropping after a period when they were high enough to make the English Channel impassable.

“We know that Neanderthals inhabited Northern France at this time, but this new evidence suggests that as soon as sea levels dropped, and a ‘land bridge’ appeared across the English Channel, they made the journey by foot to Kent,” Wenban-Smith told BBC. The dearth of evidence for human occupation in Britain between 200,000 and 65,000 years ago has perplexed the archaeologists.  The English Channel would have posed a physical barrier to humans trying to cross the continent. However, sea levels fluctuated during this period.  There were other times when hunters could walk from France to southern England.

About 200,000 – 130,000 years ago the sea level was predominantly low.  Humans should have been able to get there, but for some reason they did not show up. “It could be something subtle like the rapidity of changing climate, altering its state from warmer to colder conditions. That may have meant it was too hard for the Neanderthals to develop a sustainable adaptation,” Wenban-Smith told BBC. “Neanderthals were cold adapted and maybe it just took them that time to adapt to the cold environment of that period. Before 130,000, they had not really cracked it. But after 115,000, they had cracked it.”

About 130,000 years ago sea levels rose and Neanderthals would have been blocked from entering Britain by the English Channel.  However, about 115,000 years ago sea levels fell again. Wenban-Smith and his team said the flint tools from Dartford suggest that humans were able to take advantage of this opportunity. The discovery was dated back by using a method known as optically stimulated luminescence (OSL).  This exploits the presence of radioactive isotopes in the natural environment. Naturally occurring minerals like quartz and feldspars record the amount of radiation to which they have been exposed.

Some minerals store a proportion of energy radiation delivered and then release it at a later date in the form of light. The amount of light released by these minerals can be used to calculate the radiation dose a sample has received, helping to give an estimation of time that has elapsed since it was buried. White raised doubts over the reliability of OSL dating though, saying the technique was more or less “in constant development.” He added that assumptions about background radiation and average water content could significantly affect results.

“I haven’t seen the flints, but I’ve no doubt they are genuine. Currently, with what has leaked to the press, I have no idea of the context of these finds,” he told BBC News. “I suspect there is a possibility the OSL dating [technique] might not be giving us the true date. And that would be my only [reservation].” “I have similar dates from a site near Dover in Kent, which have come out between 90,000 and 100,000 years ago. But I don’t think OSL is giving us a correct date and I have disregarded them.”

Neanderthals split from our evolutionary line about 500,000 years ago.  A short, muscular physique, a barrel chest, large brain and prominent facial features characterized them. Wenban-Smith along with other researchers say that the “classic” Neanderthal features appeared about 200,000 years ago. However, other scientists describe much older fossils as Neanderthals.  These include the 400,000-year-old partial skull found in Kent and the 230,000-year-old human teeth discovered at Pontnewydd in Wales.

On the Net:

Original article here

Hornorkesteret comment: I wonder why the Oxford archeologists placed a tiny white, red-eyed rabbit in the foreground of the accompanying picture?